Jesus, Muhammad, a Sudanese Teddy Bear, Irshad Manji, and Me

Irshad Manji, a Canadian activist who cajoles and confronts her fellow Muslims from the theological left of Islam, recently asked some of her acquaintances what we thought of a case in the Sudan that received international attention.

An English teacher in that country invited her 7-year-old students to name their class teddy bear. The overwhelming choice was “Muhammad,” so they were then all sent home with assignments regarding their mascot.

But a staffer at the school complained that the 54-year-old teacher, Gillian Gibbons, intended to insult the Prophet. Charges were laid, Ms. Gibbons was put in prison and threatened with flogging, she was tried and found guilty, and then Sudan’s president pardoned her after considerable diplomacy at a high level and angry demonstrations on street level. (Read about it here.)

Ms. Manji, now living in New York, got into a vigorous discussion with a Sudanese cab driver about it all. (Vigorous discussions are Irshad’s stock in trade!) She blogged about it, and asked a few of us for some responses–especially asking the interesting Christmastime question, “What would Jesus do?”

I replied instead to the related question of “What would Jesus have me do?” and Irshad excerpted a bit of my answer on her blog. As for what Jesus would have done if he had been on site in Sudan, well, here are some thoughts on that question, also.

What would Jesus do? As a Christian theologian, I think the first thing Jesus would do would be to call the frightened schoolchildren to him and comfort them. As the Bible quotes Jesus saying, “Let the little children come to me, and do not stop them; for it is to such as these that the kingdom of heaven belongs” (Matthew 19:14). He certainly would not terrorize them by yanking their teacher away to be put on trial.

The second thing Jesus would do is ascertain whether the teacher intended to demean Muhammad by letting the children name a toy pet after him. If she did, then Jesus would warn her not to be so discourteous to her Sudanese hosts and neighbors by treating too lightly what they take seriously, and not to be so foolish as to provide ammunition for extremists.

If the teacher did not intend any harm, Jesus would tell her to get to know her neighbors better and to pay them due respect. She might not think it is any big deal to name a toy after Muhammad, but if her neighbors do, then she needs to “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (Matthew 7:12).

For this is not merely a question of peculiar, let alone touchy, Islamic sensibilities. No Christian names a toy pet after Peter or Paul. No Jew names a toy pet after Abraham or Moses. It is odd that Ms. Gibbons didn’t anticipate that calling a toy pet “Muhammad” might upset some Muslims.

Jesus would save his strongest words, however, for those who think that the best way to honor God is to thrash or imprison people who pay insufficient respect to one of his prophets. He would tell them to devote their energy and enthusiasm to the “weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faith” (Matthew 23:23).

Whipping up popular support by whipping infidels is a time-honored subterfuge for leaders who meanwhile are flagrantly disobeying the fundamentals of the faith. As Darfur continues to burn and bleed, the smoke and blood cry out from the ground to God, and God will not be distracted by scapegoating–or impressed by the pseudo-magnanimity of Ms. Gibbons’s pardon.

No, God is too great for that. Jesus would tell them that the day of the Lord is coming for them, and soon. Let the Sudanese authorities tremble, if they will not repent.

0 Responses to “Jesus, Muhammad, a Sudanese Teddy Bear, Irshad Manji, and Me”

  1. Julie

    She excerpted, reduced and refuted my comments also, and for the record, this is what I wrote:

    What would Jesus do? I dunno, but reflecting on what I know from the narratives, he sees many different types of people in his public ministry. He encounters the religious hierarchy, developed a core group of followers, and toward the end, when the religious hierarchy rejected his message, he looks like a disenchanted dissenter, turning over tables because he “desires mercy and not sacrifice”. He hangs out with sinners, prostitutes and tax collectors, not people to be in ancient Judea.

    I think Jesus sees all as equally misguided. He calls the Pharisees “blind leaders of the blind”, sees the masses as sheep without a shepherd, and their leaders as wolves in sheeps’ clothing. He sees the sinners, prostitutes and tax collectors (traitors to their country) as marginalized peoples in need of mercy, and thankful for every drop they receive. These were the people it seems he was joyful to hang with.

    Now, I see the cabbie, a Sudanese man working a night shift picking up Irshad in early morning, and going out of his way for her. He is a marginalized person who is deceived. He artificially bolsters his argument about the latest ‘Islam is crazy’ media frenzy with a claim of special knowledge about the case, but that’s what people do when they’re outgunned in an argument.

    I think Jesus would’ve latched on to the core issue, and not have gotten distracted by the manifestations of cruelty in human history. It was right there waiting to be explored, but quickly discarded for ‘something shiny’. Compassion. I think he would’ve inquired more along that line, and what makes one deserving.? As much as I understand about Islam, it really is up to God at the judgment to decide about one’s works and heart’s disposition. After all, we’re probably, unless we’re self deceived, feeling guilty about at least one thing in life, if not years of misspent youth, or in a more Puritan conscience, an impure thought. Why does the Islamic hierarchy impose such rigid systems, when a compassionate God would rather people act according to mercy. The accidents of history are such that it is a record of human wrongs against one another, and the topic du jour could’ve lead into an interesting discussion about mercy and compassion, which is the real thing which should correct the systems of the Islamic hierarchy. It should correct us all, in our hearts, because God is more compassionate than we can possibly be, and more merciful than we had ever hoped.

    Don’t get me wrong, I have no idea what I would’ve done, because when you’re in a situation, it is a lot different than when you have a 20 minute period of reflection on a Sunday when you are in a mindset of reflecting on Jesus both from a 30 minute sermon, and the shopping frenzy done in his name off the backs of kids in China with approval of the American government. But I digress.

    Irshad’s whole work is devoted to the work of making known the business of the Islamic world, and seeking justice and mercy like Jesus. I only hope that she can see that many people that are part of the problem are victims of their system. I feel this way about many of the things done in the name of “Christianity”.

    Smiles,

    Julie 🙂

  2. Yeni Inayah

    It is unfair to blame any killings in this region as the bye product of Islamic Intolerance. The fact is that the culture of this region is more inspired from tribalism than Islam. Unfortunately, such heinous crimes in the region always entered in the book of Islam by western scholars. Either western intellectuals failed to understand Islam or Muslim world have n’t made any efforts to communicate with them.

×

Comments are closed.